Analysis of Conspiracy Essay Example for Free

Analysis of Conspiracy Essay Within two hours the senior officials seem to casually discuss the most practical way of eliminating the Jewish race and conclude with the final policy solution. The film is based on the Wannsee protocol or the minutes the document which is authored by Adolf Eichmann and the document was found 1947 by Robert Kemper. The film is dramatized for entertainment purposes, meaning that it is not fully accurate because the creators tended to take certain liberties in making the film. Although at the end it is stated that the film ‘is based on a true story, with some scenes, events, and characters created or changed for dramatic purposes’. The issue still remains that most people tend to take films at face value, and do not bother doing further research about the topic at hand also the ending credits to do make that much of a difference to those people. The film as a historical source faces some limitations because it runs for ninety minutes when focusing on issue as deep as the origins of the final solutions, ninety minutes is not enough time to go into depth. The film would have been more valuable as a historical source if it had involved itself more in the debate of the origins of the final solution. However, film makers have a different duty from Historians their purpose is to entertain and not educate. The strongest limitation is the dialogue which is actually quiet misleading, because Pierson dramatizes it for entertainment purpose and it is mostly fictional. Eichmann stated in his testimony in 1962 that the last twenty minutes of the meeting were words like extermination and liquidation were used was removed from the official summary and summed in one sentence. Pierson and Mandel fail to analyse the document that the film is based on ‘minutes’ rather it summaries and add on fictional scenes for entertainment. For example in film Kritzinger protests against the idea of extermination because Hitler had promised him that this would not become a state policy. We also see another fictional scene where Heydrick pressures other senior officials Kritzinger and Stuckart to support him during the meeting there evidences suggests that he did not need to pressure them because he was powerful. During the first part of the meeting the senior officials discuss various solutions to the Jewish question, sterilisation of those with Jewish blood is discussed, and here the division between the politicians and the military can be seen. In the second part of the meeting the atmosphere becomes more serious when Heydrick suggests gas chambers and the rest of the men find out that S. S have already begun building extermination camps. The film should have clarified that Jews were already being murdered on an organised scale, Pierson slightly neglected that point. Film makers’ face the same problems Historians face when using the Wannsee protocol document, it is very open to interpretation when translated into English. Holocaust deniers have used the document to argue that Hitler had no involvement in the planning or implementing the final solution. Furthermore, Holocaust denier David Irving has argued the Wannsee conference was about immigration of the Jews, when testify during his trial he pointed that words such ‘killing’ or extermination of the Jews were not used in the conference. However in the film words like kill or exterminate were used, which is another inaccuracy because in the actual document killing euphemism are used instead. However Eichmann did confirm in his 1962 trail that after the meeting had ended the men became less restrained and freely discussed killing methods however this was deleted the official summary and replaced with one sentence. The film overplays the role of the Wannsee conference; Gerlach argues that the meeting occurred not to discuss the fate of Jews in Europe but for Heydrick to seek support from other senior officials. The conference was originally schedule for the 9th of December but happened on the 20th of January giving Heydrick time to prepare the new task based Hitler’s ‘basic decision’. Unlike other Historical source the film industry seem to have shallow research which it tends to exaggerate, this is one of the issues with this film. For this film to be an adequate historical source it should have not put so much emphasis on the conference and also focused to the prior events. Also the film does not address Hitler’s role in the final solution, most historical sources on this topic have done so, and Hitler’s role is one most controversial aspects of this topic. The relevance of the conference is widely debated amongst scholars, with conventional Historian arguing that the murdering of Jews had begun at the latest in December 1941 long before the conference. When focusing on the origins of the final solution the film gives an inaccurate perspective because although it mentions that the extermination camps were being built it fails to mention a mobile version of the gas chamber was already in use. In June 1941 the Soviet Union territory that was under Germany saw Jewish men of military age being executed by special mobile forces. On the 8th December an SS command unit used gas vans to kill Jews from neighbouring districts of Wartherland, clearly the preparations of the final solution began before the Wannsee conference. Clearly the final solution was already in place before the conference so there is no need place too much emphasis on it like Pierson. In conclusion, overall this a good film however if it is used as a historical source it should not be taken at face value. It is very good in delving into the bizarre Nazi psychology and behaviour and sophisticatedly highlights how their belief of the Nazi ideology had led them to dehumanise the Jews.

Education and Racism in the United States and Namibia :: Essays Papers

Education and Racism in the United States and Namibia Formal, lawfully shaped education is an intimate and delicate tool of human influence. It is therefore immeasurably dangerous. In light of our human history, no tool has been more effective at both propagating and dismantling national ideologies, often regardless of the content or meaning of what national ideology demands of its people. In the histories of the United States and southern Africa, formal education has been used to reinforce the political, social, economic and psychological effects of racism. Yet today, education is the prime tool of dismantling the consequences which racism begat. In studying human discrimination and aggression, systems of education become mouth pieces for power and authority. Investigating structures of education is key to understanding why things were the way they were, and why we are the way we are today. Understanding colonialism is fundamental in understanding why these two nations exist in this world the way they do. Both the United States and southern Africa share legacies of European colonists entering into land occupied by native peoples, and dominating these peoples through superior weaponry, disease, and doctrines of superiority; in short, through structures of racism. Today, in classrooms throughout Namibia and the United States, racism is a recognized and standard term of inequity and human injustice. In the States, racism â€Å"not only refers to personal prejudice toward people of other races, but also to the way that US institutions give power and privilege to white society while denying this same power and privilege to people of color† (SAN). In southern Africa, the modern understanding of racism is embodied in understanding the political movement of apartheid, and the legally enforced separation of non-whites from whites within society. The parallels between thes e two systems of human categorization and fundamental separation are startling; legally binding systems of racism developed into massive bodies of conflict and hate that stood firm until the 1960s. While South African apartheid was formally established as the law of the land in 1948, the same year saw the Civil Rights movement in the United States poised to grip the nation. At this point in time, the psychological effects of racism had turned into an enabling anger and resistance; people gradually were banding together to forcibly demand a new way of life. Segregating non-whites from whites, and offering whites better economic opportunity and improved education, effectively created societies of intense disparity along racial lines.

Chocolate Confectionery Industry Essay

This report will help you to uncover opportunities and understand the key issues affecting your market. How? By giving you instant access to analysis and critical recommendations. It will also challenge routine thinking by providing fresh, new perspectives that energizes your thought processes. Table of Content Introduction Definition Abbreviations Executive Summary The market Figure 1: Value sales and forecast in the UK chocolate market, by segment, 2008-13 Forecast Figure 2: Value sales and forecast in the UK chocolate market, 2008-18 Market factors Improving real spending should facilitate trading up Industry responds to health considerations Demographic changes pose challenges to chocolate Companies, brands and innovation Cadbury Dairy Milk extends its lead Figure 3: Leading brands’ sales and shares in the UK chocolate confectionery market, by value and volume, 2012/13 and 2013/14 Adspend falls in 2013 NPD looks to playfulness The consumer The consumer – Usage Figure 4: Frequency of eating chocolate, December 2013 The consumer – Reasons for eating chocolate confectionery Figure 5: Reasons for buying chocolate confectionery, December 2013 The consumer – Attitudes towards chocolate confectionery Figure 6: Attitudes towards chocolate confectionery, December 2013 The consumer – Factors influencing choice of chocolate as a gift Figure 7: Factors influencing choice when buying chocolate as a gift, December 2013 What we think Issues and Insights Faced with health concerns, chocolate can look to small formats and play off its image as a source of energy The facts The implications Innovation in tablets has hit chocolate assortments The facts The implications Hot drinks occasion and baking offer growth potential The facts The implications Browse Full Report With TOC: http://www.marketresearchreports.biz/analysis/196225 Trend Application Trend: Extend My Brand Trend: Make it Mine Mintel Futures Trend: Brand Intervention Market Drivers Key points Expected growth in consumer spending could fuel trading up Figure 8: Consumer expenditure, at current and constant 2013 prices, 2008-18 Government’s Responsibility Deal invites industry to cut calories Removing confectionery from checkouts recommended to curb impulse purchase Chocolate manufacturers plan for sustainable future supply Demographic changes pose opportunities and threats Under-35s are core users of chocolate Figure 9: Trends in the age structure of the UK population, 2008-13 and 2013-18 Rise in older cohorts will potentially dampen growth The E demographic is expected to see rapid growth Strengths and Weaknesses Strengths Weaknesses Who’s Innovating? Key points Tablets surpass seasonal launches in category share Figure 10: Share of new product launches within the UK chocolate confectionery market, by product category, 2010-13 Brands come out to play Plain flavour loses share in new launches Figure 11: Share of new product launches within the UK chocolate confectionery market, by flavour (incl. blend), 2010-13 For More Latest Reports Under the Same Category: http://www.marketresearchreports.biz/category/135 Market Size, Segmentation and Forecast Key points Market size and forecast Figure 14: UK value and volume retail sales of chocolate, 2008-18 Figure 15: Value sales and forecast in the UK chocolate confectionery market, 2008-18 Chocolate market sees sustained value growth through recession Market Share Key points Own-brand loses share despite pressures on budgets Figure 20: Leading brands’ sales and shares in the UK chocolate confectionery market, by value and volume, 2012/13 and 2013/14 Mondelēz powers up its CDM portfolio with stunning results Mars’ portfolio sees mixed results as Galaxy takes a knock but Maltesers powers ahea About Us Marketresearchreports.biz is the most comprehensive collection of market research reports. Marketresearchreports.biz services are especially designed to save time and money of our clients. We are a one stop solution for all your research needs, our main offerings are syndicated research reports, custom research, subscription access and consulting services. We serve all sizes and types of companies spanning across various industries. Contact M/s Sheela 90 Sate Street, Suite 700 Albany, NY 12207 Tel: +1-518-618-1030 USA – Canada Toll Free: +1-866-997-4948 Email: sales@marketresearchreports.biz Site: http://www.marketresearchreports.biz/

Feminism in 1970s Sitcoms Womens Liberation on TV